7 September 2026: Weekly Update – US Jobs, Inflation and the Interest Rate Outlook

Such revisions are a reminder that payrolls are one of the more volatile economic releases and suggest interested parties shouldn’t set their store by one month’s numbers. The three-month average pace of job creation remains modest by historical standards, at around 71,000 jobs a month. However, labour-force growth has also slowed, in part because of the US’s tighter immigration policy. Fewer new jobs are therefore needed to prevent unemployment rising. With overall unemployment unchanged at 4.1%, the labour market appears to be holding up better than was thought.

For investors, this is both good and bad news. Continued employment growth supports household spending and company revenues. It also makes the Federal Reserve’s inflation problem harder to resolve. A weakening jobs market would have allowed the Fed to be more patient with inflation still above its 2% target, but a stable labour market gives it less room to do so.

Yet the report does not make a September rate rise inevitable. Federal Reserve officials Christopher Waller and John Williams have both continued to stress the importance of the next inflation readings. That said, should this week’s PPI and CPI data show that price pressures remain above target, the case for a September increase becomes much stronger.

The rise in longer-term government-bond yields over recent weeks adds a further complication. In the US, the move appears to reflect a reassessment of real yields and of the strength of the economy rather than a rise in long-term inflation expectations. Inflation breakevens have remained broadly stable and the US dollar has not weakened materially. Thus higher yields are not, on this evidence, a sign that investors have lost confidence in US assets but are more consistent with a view that interest rates need to stay higher in real terms while activity proves more resilient than expected. That view finds some support in the strength of US nominal GDP growth, the rate at which the tax base, corporate revenues and household incomes expand in cash terms.

For much of the period since the financial crisis, the US government has been able to borrow at rates comfortably beneath the cash growth rate of the economy. As the chart shows, that gap has not closed and the adjustment in long-term interest rates looks incomplete. A similar pattern played out in the 1960s and 1970s, when benchmark yields lagged behind an expanding economy before eventually catching up.

The broader point is that there has not been a clear weakening of the US labour market and inflation remains above target. That presents a less comfortable backdrop for investors in long-dated bonds and for parts of the equity market priced on the assumption that rates will fall quickly.

We believe it remains sensible to own a diversified mix of assets, but with an emphasis on businesses that can grow earnings without relying on cheaper money: companies with pricing power, strong balance sheets and dependable cash generation. That approach does not depend on a particular payroll number, a single Fed meeting or the most favourable outcome for inflation.